Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



API seeks to intervene on the side of the Pentagon in Canadian oil sands case

10.01.2010  | 

Citing the need to protect US jobs and America’s energy security, the American Petroleum Institute and two other organizations today filed a petition in federal court asking to intervene on the side of the Pentagon in a case challenging its use of fuels derived from Canadian oil sands crude oil.

Keywords:

Citing the need to protect US jobs and America’s energy security, the American Petroleum Institute and two other organizations today filed a petition in federal court asking to intervene on the side of the Pentagon in a case challenging its use of fuels derived from Canadian oil sands crude oil.

API, the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association and the US Chamber of Commerce petitioned the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California to intervene in a lawsuit filed in June by the Sierra Club and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy seeking to stop the department from buying fuels derived from crude oil produced from Canadian oil sands.

“Over the next five years, Canadian oil sands development could lead to an additional 343,000 jobs in the United States,” said Bob Greco, API’s downstream director. “Those are jobs that our struggling economy could certainly use – and as the economy recovers, it could also use the half a billion barrels per year of crude oil that Canadian oil sands could provide.”

In their lawsuit, the environmental groups allege the Pentagon is not complying with section 526 of the 2007 energy bill requiring that the agency not acquire fuels derived from crude oil sources, such as Canadian oil sands, with higher greenhouse gas emissions than fuels derived from conventional sources.

API argues that the fungible nature of crude oil makes it impossible for the Pentagon to determine which fuels are derived from oil sands crude, preventing it from being able to comply with Section 526.

In addition, it says, Canadian oil sands producers comply with strict environmental rules requiring the return of all developed land to its natural state.

“And, contrary to claims, the lifecycle of greenhouse gas emissions from the crude oil from oil sands are comparable to those from other crude oils refined in the United States,” Greco said.

API contends that keeping the Pentagon from using Canadian crude would also make the nation less energy secure and more dependent on oil from overseas.

“No oil source outside our own borders is more secure than Canada,” Greco said.



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT



Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


69%

31%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.