Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • To include more than one recipient, please seperate each email address with a semi-colon ';'



US Republicans plan new tactics to secure approval of Keystone XL oil pipeline

01.30.2012  |  HP News

Politicians unveiled a bill that could push through approval of the project over the objections of President Barack Obama.

Keywords:

By TENNILLE TRACY

Republicans in Congress are setting up another showdown with President Barack Obama over the Keystone XL oil pipeline, unveiling a bill Monday that pushes through approval of the project over the president's objections. 

More than 40 Senate Republicans have gotten behind the bill, authorizing TransCanada Corp. to build the 1,700-mile pipeline from Canada to Texas.

The legislation is meant to circumvent the need for the president's approval after Obama rejected the pipeline earlier this month.

The Senate bill has the support of 43 Republicans and one Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who tends to side with Republicans on energy issues.

The Senate bill mirrors efforts in the House, where Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) said he plans to attach a pipeline-approval measure to a new jobs bill being introduced this week.

Until recently, Republicans had been eager to force the president to make a politically tough call on Keystone in an election year.

In December, they passed legislation that imposed a 60-day deadline on a White House decision.

Following the administration's decision to reject a pending application for the pipeline - while also welcoming a new proposal from TransCanada - Republicans have switched tactics and are now looking for ways to push through approval themselves.

The application for the Keystone XL pipeline, which would pass through six US states, had been pending before the State Department since 2008.

Environmental groups oppose the pipeline because it will transport a type of unconventional oil, known as tar sands, that requires more processing and more air pollution before it can be used.

The oil and natural-gas industry said the pipeline will create jobs and reduce America's dependence on Middle East oil.


Dow Jones Newswires



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Eduar
03.26.2012

Too many have bbeen badly misled about the fratocs involving the Pipeline.Environmentally it causes no harm as proven with the hundreds of pipelines crisscrossing our country. Nebraska had already established a committee to work with Keystone on an alternate route, QUITE SOME TIME AGO, with pledged co-operation from Keystone. The Oil to be shipped from the area identified as Tar Sands in Canada is the name of a place not of the oil that would flow freely in the pipeline.. The number of barrels of oil from this resource each day would more than supplant the need of oil from Venezuela. The construction of this 36 line would provide hundreds of high paying jobs for many years. It would also help create many more boom oil towns such as Williston, N. Dak. where many jobs have been created with wages from $60-80 thousand per year.These same arguments against a pipeline were yelled from the treetops and Ice when the Alaskan line was proposed.So why not the Keystone line?Jack Nemerov

Related articles


FEATURED EVENT

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US government impose limits on LNG exports in order to maintain low domestic gas prices?


36%

4%

60%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2011 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2011 Gulf Publishing Company.