Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



US trade groups slam EPA for E15 ethanol blend, citing risk to consumers

04.05.2012  | 

The API and AFPM trade groups are critical of the US EPA's recent decision to approve higher levels of ethanol in gasoline (E15) before testing is complete, alleging that it could put consumers at risk. Earlier this week, the EPA approved the first applications to make E15, a 50% increase from the E10 blend.

Keywords:

The American Petroleum Institute (API) and American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) trade groups are critical of the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) recent decision to approve higher levels of ethanol in gasoline (E15) before testing is complete, alleging that it could put consumers at risk.

“EPA is choosing to ignore the red flags in its headlong rush to allow more ethanol in gasoline, putting consumers and their vehicles at risk,” said API director of downstream operations Bob Greco.

“Testing needs to be completed before this new fuel mixture is introduced into Americans’ gas tanks.”

Greco said the EPA decision comes before the completion of thorough testing by the automobile and oil industries to ensure the safety and performance of the new fuel for vehicles.

He said that testing results so far have revealed problems with E15 and that engine damage from its use may not be covered under vehicle manufacturer warranties.

“API supports a realistic and workable Renewable Fuel Standard and the responsible introduction of increased biofuels in a manner that protects consumers and the investments they’ve made in their vehicles,” Greco said.

“However, we cannot rush to allow more ethanol before we know the consequences."

Greco said that the US oil and natural gas industry is the largest consumer of ethanol and other biofuels and remains committed to the use of renewable fuels in the US energy mix.

Earlier this week, the EPA approved the first applications to make E15, a 50% increase from the E10 blend allowed at present.

AFPM president Charles T. Drevna issued a similarly scathing statement.

"Unfortunately, the EPA announcement represents yet another in the agency's unwise, premature and irresponsible series of actions in its rush to force E15 to the marketplace," Drevna said. 

"EPA's hasty attempts to speed introduction of E15 before necessary testing is complete could endanger the safety of American consumers, threatening their vehicles and gasoline-powered equipment with possibly severe damage,” he continued.

“This action is more about political science than real science because it is designed to protect the ethanol industry rather than the American people. This decision is particularly troubling, since recent information released by the Coordinating Research Council shows failures when using E15 in vehicles approved by EPA.

“With a lawsuit by AFPM and other organizations on this critical issue about to be heard, there is no reason for EPA to have rushed to judgment and acted so recklessly.”



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

chuck
04.05.2012

The ethanol industry is only interested in saling as much ethanol as they possibly can and getting the corn price as high as they can. Forgetting about what it does to consumers vehicles, let alone food prices. They need to concentrate more on making e85 a viable fuel source. Its a huge market with very few players. If ethanol is saving us money why does it cost more to drive a flex vehicle on e85 vs gas (10-20% more). A lot of their numbers do not take into account that there is at least 30% less energy in ethanol. The only way ethanol exist is because of the mandate. Remove the mandates and allow people to make their choice. EPA has done a lot of things that hurt this country.

OSCAR FRIAS
04.05.2012

The testing in USA should be complemented with the tests done internationally. I suggest contacting the Federación Nacional de Biocombustibles de Colombia reports. In Colombia a large number of vehicles, from small to large cars, brand new to 10+ years old, even some with carburetors and most fuel injected. The sample included light to medium trucks and the test was done for more than one year and thousands of kilometers for each vehicle. There were no damages at all in the engines, hoses, fuel pumps, exhaust converters, tanks, or any other component. There were absolutely no safety issues at all. Brazil has similar tests and in this country E80 and E90 are in use since many years ago. Consider that many US cars are imported from Brazil and other US made cars are exported to Colombia.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

GasPro North America

Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


67%

33%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.