Auto repair costs for consumers could rise due to
adverse effects of fuel containing 15% ethanol blends (E15), according to
new results from a two-year study on engine durability.
The study was conducted by FEV, a longtime consultant to the
US Environmental Protection Agency, on
behalf of the Coordinating Research Council (CRC).
The CRC study released Wednesday showed adverse results from
E15 use in certain popular, high-volume models of cars, its
Problems included damaged valves and valve seats, which can
lead to loss of compression and power, diminished vehicle
performance, misfires, engine damage, as well as poor fuel
economy and increased emissions.
Clearly many vehicles on the road today are at risk of
harm from E15. The unknowns concern us greatly, since only a
fraction of vehicles have been tested to determine their
tolerance to E15, said Mitch Bainwol, CEO of the Auto
Alliance trade group.
Automakers did not build these vehicles to handle the
more corrosive E15 fuel. Thats why we urged EPA to wait
for the results of further testing.
The potential costs to consumers are significant, the study
says. The most likely repair would be cylinder head
replacement, which costs from $2000-4000 for single cylinder
head engines and twice as much for V-type engines.
Our goal is to ensure that new alternative fuels are
not placed into retail until it has been proven they are safe
and do not cause harm to vehicles, consumers, or the environment, said Mike
Stanton, CEO of the Global Automakers trade group. The
EPA should have waited until all the studies on the potential
impacts of E15 on the current fleet were completed.
Automakers believe that renewable fuels are an
important component of our national energy security, but it is
not in the longer term interest of the government, vehicle
manufacturers, fuel distributors or the ethanol industry itself, to find out
after the fact that equipment or performance problems are
occurring from rushing a new fuel into the national
marketplace, added Bainwol.
Growth Energy, an ethanol industry trade group, petitioned the
EPA in March 2009 to raise the limit on ethanol in gasoline
from 10 to 15%.
In June 2008, EPA outlined testing needed for the agency to
approve a waiver, and EPA requirements were consistent with
test plans developed by the auto and oil industries.
The CRC, composed of engineers from the auto and oil
industries, was working with EPA and US Department of Energy
(DOE) on a multi-year suite of tests on the effects of higher
blends of ethanol, according to the trade
This testing included more than $14.5 million of research
sponsored by the auto and oil industries, and $40 million of
testing sponsored by the federal government.
Before those tests were completed - in October 2010 and
January 2011 the EPA granted partial waivers
to allow the introduction of E15 into the marketplace for use
in model year 2001 and later vehicles.
EPAs decision was based largely on a DOE study of the
effects of E15 on durability of catalytic converters, the
primary pollution control system in a vehicle
EPA did not undertake or wait to consider the results of
this engine durability test, or for other E15 related research
still underway, the groups allege.
The CRC study took duplicates of eight different vehicle
model engines spanning 2001-2009 model years. All 16 vehicles
were tested over a 500-hour durability cycle corresponding to
about 100,000 miles of vehicle usage, the authors said.
A range of engine operating parameters was monitored during
the test, including cylinder compression, valve wear, valve
leakage, emissions and emissions control
Two of the engines tested on E15 were said to have
mechanical damage. Another engine showed increased tailpipe emissions beyond the allowable
More details on the study can be found at the Global
Automakers' website by clicking here.