Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



US lawmakers ask EPA to cut production mandate for corn-based ethanol

08.02.2012  | 

As a result of the drought, “corn prices have risen dramatically over the past few weeks and are likely to remain at record highs,” the lawmakers said in a letter to be sent to the Environmental Protection Agency. The letter follows a petition filed earlier this week by the US livestock industry.

Keywords:

By BILL TOMSON

WASHINGTON -- More than a hundred House Republicans and Democrats are calling on the federal government to reduce its production mandate for corn-based ethanol in an effort to bring down prices for the grain that have become much more expensive for livestock producers during the drought that grips much of the country.

As a result of the drought, “corn prices have risen dramatically over the past few weeks and are likely to remain at record highs,” the lawmakers said in a letter to be sent to the Environmental Protection Agency.

“This means literally billions of dollars in increased costs for livestock and poultry producers, and food manufacturers.”

And at least some of that cost increase is expected to be passed to meat packers and then, eventually, to consumers in grocery stores.

The USDA predicted that the price of all food will climb 3% to 4% next year due to the drought.

John Bryant, chief executive of the Kellogg Co., known for brands such as Corn Flakes, Eggo and Nutri-Grain, said Thursday he supports requests for a reduction in the mandate.

“To continue to have 40% of the US corn crop going into ethanol production is very questionable policy,” Mr. Bryant said.

The letter follows a petition filed with the EPA earlier this week by representatives of the US livestock industry, asking the agency to halt the ethanol mandate for a year.

The EPA, under the authority of the Clean Air Act, does have the authority to temporarily halt or reduce the mandate for ethanol production that is required by the federal Renewable Fuels Standard.

The agency, which denied a petition by Texas Governor Rick Perry in 2008 to reduce the mandate, said it will only issue a waiver if the mandate is shown to “severely harm the economy of a state, region, or the United States.”

Dave Warner, a spokesman for the National Pork Producers Council, said the coalition of livestock groups filed its petition Monday, but have not received a response yet from the agency. EPA officials were unavailable for immediate comment.

The letter from House members will be sent soon, a House aide said Thursday.

The National Chicken Council lauded the letter from lawmakers and urged the EPA to exercise the authority Congress gave it to reduce the ethanol mandate.

The Renewable Fuel Standard requires about 15 billion gallons of ethanol, mostly derived from corn, be blended into gasoline this year.

Swine, chicken, and turkey producers are scrambling to find the feed they need, the industry groups said, while the government continues to force about 40% of the US corn crop into ethanol production.

Cattle mostly graze on pastureland and are fed hay for most of their lives before they begin to consume corn- and soy-based feed shortly before slaughter.

“Drought is out of our hands and is absolutely unavoidable; however, the ethanol mandate is not and must be stopped,” said J.D. Alexander, president of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and a cattle rancher.

But ethanol proponents say the industry can't be blamed for the drought and there will be plenty of corn for all who need it.

“Higher corn process facing livestock and poultry users is a result of Mother Nature, not ethanol,” said Tom Buis, chief executive of the ethanol production group Growth Energy. “To try and blame the ethanol industry is disingenuous and absurd.”

More than a third of the corn produced in the US goes into ethanol production. The ethanol industry will consume about 4.8 billion bushels of corn this year, according to the latest US Department of Agriculture forecast, and farmers are expected to produce about 13 billion bushels.


Dow Jones Newswires



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Jim Hasty
08.08.2012

There is typically a corn surplus at the end of most years after the world has had its fill. Also, livestock do not need the starch used in the ethanol process, only the fiber waste products - why hasn't that been utilized by industry?

Leonard E Wheeler
08.07.2012

Dr Roscoe Bartlett R Md Chair House Science Committee spoke on this in 2006 in the Congressional Record. He addressed gas oil nuclear and importantly fuel Ethanol . It was not a positive energy balance when fuel cost were lower and it definitely is not when fuel cost and corn are lots higher . Also Dr David Pinentel PhD Cornell has countless peer reviewed studies that makes corn ethanol for fuel a stupid and expensive waste of tax funding and public monies given alternatives that are cheaper

Herb Katz
08.07.2012

Ethanol mandate is a wealth transfer form the pockets of motor fuel purchasers to (most especially) the so called ethanol refiners. The obfuscation of the economic justification is a laugh. There is no end of acetaldehyde and acetic acid coming out of all our tailpipes now. Shhhhh! The milage efficiency sacrifice is ignored. What a enormous theft and health impact.

Larry Lesnick
08.07.2012

The inclusion of ethanol in my motor fuel reduces my car's miles per gallon with little benefit. It also caused $1,000 in repairs to my boat. It is time to discontinue the use of ethanol as a fuel component.

Brad ONeal
08.07.2012

30% of the corn supply goes to feed the ethanol industry so that we can lose money on it as a gasoline additive. And the ethanol industry is not responsible for higher corn prices? Really? Tom Buis comment as CEO of Growth Energy is 'disingenious and absurd.'

Bernard Legrand
08.07.2012

“Higher corn process facing livestock and poultry users is a result of Mother Nature, not ethanol,” said Tom Buis.
What does that have to do with the issue at hand? Who cares about who is responsible for the drought? And that guy is a CEO???

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

GasPro North America

Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


68%

32%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.