Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



Increased operating costs in the Asia-Pacific region could derail growth

01.01.2013  |  Thinnes, Billy,  Hydrocarbon Processing Staff, Houston, TX

Keywords: [costs] [supply chain] [complexity] [construction] [oil and gas]

Rising operating costs will be the biggest barrier to oil and gas companies’ growth in Asia-Pacific next year, according to a 2013 outlook for the industry by GL Noble Denton. While the sector’s rapid growth is bringing new opportunities to the region, research shows that significant challenges remain.

According to initial results from a survey of nearly 400 senior industry professionals, over half of those from the Asia-Pacific region (53%) identified rising costs as one of their three biggest concerns for 2013, and a serious threat to the growth of their business. This represents a substantial increase compared to last year when, in a similar survey, just 39% of respondents from the region forecast increased operating costs as a top three barrier to business growth in 2012.

“The mounting cost of operations is largely due to an increase in the complexity of oil and gas projects, a surge in insurance premiums and the acute lack of suitably qualified professionals across the region,” said Richard Bailey, an executive vice president for GL Noble Denton. “Add to this a rising tide of supply chain consolidation—a trend that’s making it harder for smaller companies to secure work on large ventures with high capital expenditure, many of which are in Australia. To this end, the game is definitely becoming one that increasingly favors Asia-Pacific’s big players. The smaller outfits, which may not have the same track record and process experience, need to fight very hard to stay in the game.”

The report takes an overall bullish perspective on growth in the region and predicts substantial industry spending, given the complexity of the projects and the need to improve the operational efficiency of assets. HP



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Anna
03.13.2013

Remember The War on Terror and the term Colateral Damage . Let me refresh your mmorey, when you drop bombs on someone, say Al Quida or the Taliban, sometimes you skip and get women and children. To make it a bit more palatable for the public at home, you call it Colateral Damage , didn't mean to receive those innocent bystanders, but they were in the wrong place.MKs are Colateral Damage . The generals sent the NTM troops into foreign lands to drop religon on the masses. But the MKs ended up in boarding school along with a few of your Sergeants were a bit heavy using the discipline in addition to a bit free with their hands and other bits of anatomy. The war may happen to be likely well, but evaluate the Colateral Damage .Time for OPERATION CLEANUP and also a few court marshalls.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


82%

18%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2013 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2013 Gulf Publishing Company.