Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



Companies propose 800-mile Alaska gas pipeline

02.18.2013  | 

Under the companies' plan, an 800-mile pipeline would be built with the capacity to ship 3 billion to 3.5 billion cubic feet of gas to an area near a port where the gas would be turned into a liquid. The LNG would be stored in tanks and loaded onto tankers from a loading jetty with two berths.

Keywords:

By CASSANDRA SWEET

ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, BP and TransCanada said they plan to develop a natural-gas pipeline from Alaska's North Slope to a port where the gas would be prepared for export as part of a project expected to cost $45 billion to $65 billion.

The companies provided some details for the proposed Alaska gas pipeline in a letter to Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell.

Under the companies' plan, or "concept," an 800-mile pipeline would be built with the capacity to ship 3 billion to 3.5 billion cubic feet of gas to an area near a port where the gas would be turned into a liquid.

The liquefied natural gas would be stored in tanks and loaded onto tankers from a loading jetty with two berths, according to a plan attached to the letter. In addition to those facilities, a natural-gas treatment facility would be built on the North Slope, near Prudhoe Bay, near where the gas would be produced.

The liquefaction plant would be built on a 400-acre to 600-acre site and be able to process 15 million to 18 million tons of gas a year, executives with the comapnies said in the letter.

"We remain committed to responsibly developing the State's considerable resources and will keep you advised of our progress," read the letter, which was signed by Randy Broiles at ExxonMobil, Trond-Erik Johansen at ConocoPhillips, Janet Weiss at BP and Tony Palmer at TransCanada.

If built, the gas pipeline and export facility would be one of the largest LNG projects in the world, said Mr. Parnell, who has strongly supported development of Alaska's gas and a pipeline to ship the gas to overseas markets. As part of an agreement with the state, the companies promised to provide periodic updates on their pipeline-development plans.

"I am pleased the companies met the benchmarks," Mr. Parnell said in a statement. "I look forward to working with them as they advance this public-private partnership."


Dow Jones Newswires



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Diane Urban
03.11.2013

I do not see in this proposal any guarantees of first delivering gas to specific locations in Alaska at a REASONABLE PRICE! It looks like the parties involved plan on by-passing Alaska consumers and shipping it overseas, and then selling it back to Alaskans at an astronomical price, just like they have done with Alaskan oil!!
The common consumer will again get taken to the cleaners while
already rich executives rake in the profits!Or worse, Alaskans will
totally be left out of the supply route, and the rich will again get richer, all the while saying to the Alaskan people, "It's good for the economy." But whose economy?

Gustavo Heins
02.20.2013

More pollution

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT


Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


63%

37%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.