Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



Survey finds majority support Keystone XL pipeline

04.23.2013  | 

Nearly 75% of Americans and 68% of Canadians said they support or somewhat support the project, which would carry heavy crude from the Alberta oil sands to the US Gulf for refining. "Energy security, particularly in the US, is driving views on energy issues," said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.

Keywords:

By PAUL VIEIRA

A majority of Americans and Canadians back TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL pipeline and say securing a stable energy supply for North America should be a bigger priority than reducing carbon emissions, a poll released Tuesday found.

Nearly 75% of Americans and 68% of Canadians indicated they "support" or "somewhat support" the project, which would carry heavy crude from the Alberta oil sands to the US Gulf Coast for refining, according to the poll conducted by Ottawa-based Nanos Research.

The poll also asked participants -- 1,007 Americans and 1,013 Canadians -- which was more important: reducing greenhouse-gas emissions or having North America free from oil imports? Both a majority of Americans and Canadians, 63% and 55%, respectively, suggested reducing reliance on oil imports trumped environmental policy.

"Energy security, particularly in the US, is driving views on energy issues," said Nik Nanos, president of Nanos Research.

Environmentalists argue that development of the Alberta oil sands for the crude that Keystone would carry will increase emissions of greenhouse gases.

The poll contacted Americans between March 28 and April 7, and Canadians between April 6 and April 9.

The Obama administration is, for a second time, reviewing TransCanada's application to build Keystone after rejecting the project in 2012. Keystone faces stiff opposition in the US from environmental groups and key Democratic policy makers.

Canada's Conservative government, led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has said building Keystone XL would ensure a safe, stable supply of energy for the US and reduce reliance on oil from politically volatile regions such as the Middle East.


Dow Jones Newswires



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

W. Grant Frankenberg
04.24.2013

It is incomprehensible to me that anyone in USA would object to importing additional Canadian hydrocarbons.
Why wouldn't US citizens want to become less dependent on fragile middle east sources?

Charles Scouten
04.24.2013

Did this survey point out that nearly all the Canadian crude imported via Keystone XL will be process in the US, then exported? Or than petroleum products now surpass agricultural products as the leading US export? Or that refineries in the US upper midwest already run Canadian crude imported on other existing pipelines? Or that the US has strong, responsible pipeline companies? Or was this a "push poll" tour de force?

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT


Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


64%

36%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.