Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



Canadian Prime Minister Harper takes Keystone XL lobbying campaign to US

05.17.2013  | 

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper took his case for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline to the United States, burnishing Canada's environmental credentials and saying the arguments for the project are "overwhelmingly on the side of approval."

Keywords:

By ALISTAIR MACDONALD AND TENNILLE TRACY

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper took his case for approval of the Keystone XL pipeline to the United States, burnishing Canada's environmental credentials and saying the arguments for the project are "overwhelmingly on the side of approval."

Speaking in New York, Mr. Harper repeated arguments his deputies have made repeatedly in their own trips to Washington. Ottawa says the project will reduce United States dependence on oil from less stable and less friendly countries like Venezuela, and create jobs on both sides of the border. But by making the pitch himself, Mr. Harper dramatically ratcheted up the level of government lobbying over the line, proposed by Calgary based TransCanada.

"I think all the facts are overwhelmingly on the side of approval of this, but there is a process in the United States," he said, speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations.

He also took aim at critics who have said the line would boost global greenhouse gas emissions. Environmentalists and some prominent Democrats in the United States have said the project, which would boost exports of Canadian crude to the United States, would heighten America's dependence on fossil fuel, including heavy Canadian oil sands crude. Oil sands production is generally more carbon intensive than many blends of conventional oil, but is less intensive than others.

Mr. Harper said building the line would add "almost nothing globally" to carbon emissions. Meanwhile, he sought to portray Canada as an environmentally conscious nation that is doing its share to cap global emissions.

"Truth of the matter is, heavy oils out of the oil sands, yes, there are still emission issues, but no more than other places in the world," he said. Mr. Harper also said the United States should not "turn up" its nose at the potential of 40,000 construction jobs, or the prospect of being able to reduce its dependence from oil shipped in from overseas by 40%.

Washington is currently deliberating whether to approve the 875 mile pipeline, envisioned to carry oil sands crude from Alberta to Nebraska, for further shipment to refineries on the Gulf Coast.

The project has divided Washington and featured prominently in the United States presidential election last year. In Canada, Keystone is a crucial economic issue.

A lack of pipeline capacity has bottled up Canadian supplies, triggering wildly volatile prices that have threatened provincial and federal revenue and clouded future investment in the Canadian oil sector.

The State Department is expected to finalize its environmental review of the project in coming weeks. After that, the department will seek input from federal agencies for 90 days and then determine whether the project serves the national interest. Still, officials say there is no set timetable for a final decision.

"The State Department continues to review the permit application for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline in a rigorous, transparent, and efficient manner," a State Department official said. "The State Department will make a determination after we have thoroughly and transparently considered all the issues."

Capitol Hill Republicans continue to pressure President Barack Obama to deliver swift approval for Keystone. A GOP controlled House transportation committee approved a bill that would effectively push through approval for the project. The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved a similar bill in April.

Dow Jones Newswires



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Jamie Clark
05.21.2013

With respect to Mr. Harper's solid reasoning on why the Keystone Pipeline shall be a win/win for both nations, and the world for that matter, I would like to add some brief industry experienced notes. These notes are backed by my 20+ yrs working as an API inspector both nationally and international.
1.) Here in the U.S. and further more in Canda, we "Whole Heartedly abide" by API standards and recommended practices. The U.K. and most European countries also abide by equal and sometimes greater standards.
2.) Now negatively speaking my experience working in countries like Angola, Nigeria, Brasil's standards are modeled by API but aren't strictly adhered to. Their PSM programs are in best cases grass roots. Thus green house emissions are most high!
3.) Taking the two above statements coupled with our country creating most of the technology as well as the jobs that will be created by the Keystone project it should be a no brainer for our nation to form this partnership.

Regards,
Jamie Clark

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

GasPro North America

Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


68%

32%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.