Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



West Virginia chemical spill spurs study of health effects

02.17.2014  |  HP News Services

Keywords: [chemical spill] [health] [Freedom Industries]

By MARK DRAJEM
Bloomberg

The odor in drinking water lingering more than a month after a chemical spill in West Virginia is prompting officials to test homes and consider the potential long-term health effects from exposure.

After initial resistance, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin named Andrew Whelton from the University of South Alabama to test water from 10 Charleston-area homes to see if chemical residues are still present. The first batch of samples was shipped to laboratories recently, and evidence of the chemical’s distinctive licorice odor has been found in at least one home, Whelton said.

Separately, the local county health commissioner, Rahul Gupta, said his office will begin studying possible long-term health effects of exposure to the chemical used in coal processing, known as Crude MCHM, especially for signs of birth defects or cancer.

“There are more unanswered questions for us to state either way” that the water is safe, Gupta said in an interview. “We need to find the long-term consequences from exposure.”

The Jan. 9 leak of Crude MCHM and some related chemicals used to clean coal triggered the largest “do-not-use” order by the West Virginia water utility, covering 300,000 people in the capital and nine nearby counties. Whelton said the disaster is “unprecedented” in its scope and severity.

Oversight Gaps

The experience in West Virginia underscores gaps in the oversight of chemicals and the limits to much of the safety testing now done by companies, health specialists said. Eastman Chemical, the maker of the chemical, tested for possible toxic effects from high doses on rats over 28 days. It has been 35 days since the spill was detected.

Eastman’s results don’t “speak to what this could be doing in the long-term,” said Adam Finkel, a senior fellow at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and former director of health standards at the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration. “We know things are toxic and don’t cause cancer, and vice versa.”

Eastman isn’t conducting any follow-up tests of its own. Its earlier tests determined that the compound isn’t a mutagen, indicating it doesn’t alter genetic material, and so “it is unlikely that Crude MCHM is a carcinogen,” said Maranda Demuth, a company spokeswoman.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also said it has sees no reason to worry about the delays.

CDC Encouraged

“It is encouraging at this point that we do not see indications that long-term health effects are a likely outcome of this incident,” said Bernadette Burden, a spokeswoman for the Atlanta-based agency.

West Virginia American Water Co., the local utility, warned customers about using water after thousands of gallons of 4- methylcyclohexane methanol spilled from a tank at Freedom Industries and into the Elk River, upstream from a treatment plant.

The level of the chemical in the water is now below one part per million, which the CDC says makes it safe to consume. Lower levels of the chemical persist in many homes and schools, according to testing and residents who say they can still smell it.

The water company is dealing with a lack of certainty about potential health risks from the low-level exposure.

“We’re dealing with this fear of the water, because it has this odor to it,” Jeff McIntyre, president of West Virginia American Water, said at a congressional hearing in Charleston on Feb. 10. “Just because you smell something doesn’t mean it’s not safe.”

‘Not Normal’

Health advocates say the odor may signal that something is amiss in the water. The risks of showering and inhaling fumes released from hot water may be an added worry, said Jennifer Sass, a senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“It’s not normal that you are smelling these at safe levels,” Sass said. “I would not drink anything that tasted or smelled bad.”

Sass said the CDC erred in setting the safe level of MCHM in water at one part per million, and instead should have set it at a level 40 times lower, close to a concentration at which the chemical can no longer be detected.

Whelton is checking the water in 10 homes, taking as many as 60 samples from each to determine if different temperatures or faucets contain higher levels of the chemicals. The initial results were sent to out-of-state laboratories today.

Whelton has said it’s possible the chemical adhered to plastic pipes in the homes or to corroded metal pipes, or that it broke down into other compounds.

Gupta, executive director of the Kanawha-Charleston Health Department, said his office will be working with local doctors to determine the long-term consequences.

“The most important point is to identify and apply early detection techniques” for local doctors, he said.



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


81%

19%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2013 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2013 Gulf Publishing Company.