Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



British Columbia unveils tax on LNG exporters

02.19.2014  |  HP News Services

British Columbia’s proposed tax provides long-awaited financial clarity to energy companies deciding whether to invest in shipping the fuel from Canada’s Pacific Coast.

Keywords:

By REBECCA PENTY
Bloomberg

British Columbia’s proposed tax on natural gas exports provides long-awaited financial clarity to energy companies deciding whether to spend as much as $240 billion to start shipping the fuel from Canada’s Pacific Coast.

Profits from liquefied natural gas, or LNG, projects will be taxed at an initial rate of 1.5%, Michael de Jong, finance minister for the nation’s westernmost province, said as the government released its budget for the fiscal year beginning in April. The rate will rise to as much as 7% after companies recover the costs of building the shipping terminals.

The province plans to erase its debt with revenues from the LNG sector, which may add C$1 trillion ($913 billion) to its economy by 2046. ExxonMobil, Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell are among companies seeking to liquefy low-cost Canadian gas so it can be shipped to Asian markets that pay as much as five times more than North America.

“The tax-rate framework as laid out brings some needed clarity to the industry, so that’s positive,” said Geoff Morrison, a Victoria-based manager with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. “The tax is one component of the all-in costs that a proponent would face. Are these the right rates? I can’t say for sure.”

The province said its tax and royalty rates will be lower than in Australia and five US states, where competing projects are being built.

Final Approval

The government plans to seek approval of the rates from the legislature before the end of the year. Additional regulations related to gas exports are expected in 2015. The tax won’t be collected until plants are running, after 2017, de Jong said.

“We’d like investment decisions to be made as soon as possible, construction to start as soon as possible,” de Jong told reporters before introducing the budget in the legislature, in the provincial capital of Victoria. “Once that happens, we derive the benefits related to construction and ultimately the revenue stream that flows in part from the LNG income tax.”

More than a dozen LNG projects have been proposed in British Columbia as producers seek to capitalize on Canadian fields including the Montney Shale, estimated to contain 449 trillion cubic feet of gas. No companies have yet made a final decision to proceed.

‘Cash Windfall’

British Columbia has the chance to reap a “cash windfall” with LNG, as its neighbor Alberta has done with oil sands producers, Brian Kristjansen, Geoff Ready and Maxim Sytchev, analysts with Dundee Capital Markets, wrote in a report last month. The analysts said companies could spend as much as C$262 billion on gas drilling, pipelines and terminals if three plants proceed.

Even if only one large project moves ahead, the industry may spend C$100 billion on drilling, pipelines and export plants, the analysts wrote.

The provincial government continues to plan on three plants being built in British Columbia by 2020, de Jong said. “We think that’s achievable. I don’t underestimate the complications and challenges of getting there.”

A single plant could generate as much as C$1.4 billion of LNG income taxes after 10 years in operation, de Jong said yesterday in the British Columbia legislature. The government’s tax plan and competitiveness with other regions was assessed by Ernst & Young.

Needed Framework

Yesterday’s tax proposal emerged after months of talks between the government and industry representatives.

“Governments need to have effective fiscal frameworks and regulatory approval processes in place that can balance industry requirements for certainty, timeliness and a reasonable return on investment with other stakeholder concerns of environmental impacts and social benefits,” Jeff Lehrmann, president of Chevron’s Canadian subsidiary, said at an October energy conference in Calgary.

In addition to the LNG tax, companies must consider other project costs of building in British Columbia, including taxes on carbon emissions and corporate income, the price of laying pipelines across mountains, a shortage of skilled labor and potential conflicts with aboriginal groups over land access.

British Columbia plans to collect C$1.23 billion from its carbon tax in the fiscal year starting in April and C$441 million from gas royalties, according to budget documents. The province taxes carbon emitted within its boundaries at a level of C$30 a metric ton.

Uncertain Impact

The absence in the budget of an estimate for total government revenues from LNG and when they’ll be collected makes it tough to weigh whether the industry is worth the environmental costs, including water use in gas drilling and carbon emissions from shipping terminals, said Matt Horne, a Vancouver-based director of the Pembina Institute, a nonprofit environmental research group.

Canadian projects already face higher construction costs compared with US proposals to build export facilities at existing import terminals, said Ed Kallio, a Calgary-based director at Ziff Energy, a division of HSB Soloman Associates. Australian project costs may decline if Prime Minister Tony Abbott is able to fulfill a promise to repeal the nation’s carbon tax.

“The industry wants to make sure that when you add all of that up, you don’t kill that golden goose,” Kallio said. “These are big companies and they have a portfolio of projects around the world that are all competing for capital.”



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


85%

15%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2013 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2013 Gulf Publishing Company.