Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



US emergency order requires new safety tests for crude-by-rail shippers

02.26.2014  | 

Responding to recent train disasters, the US Department of Transportation issued new safety guidelines that reclassify shale crudes and the tank cars that can safely ship such cargoes.

Keywords: [shale oil] [Canadian oil sands] [bitumen] [safety] [flammable] [tank car] [rail car]

By LYNN DOAN, JOE CARROLL and JIM SNYDER
Bloomberg

New emergency rules will require US energy companies using railroads to carry crude must conduct tests to help ensure that the oil cargoes will not explode or corrode holes through tank cars after train derailments. 

An order issued by the US Transportation Department (DOT) requires oil explorers including Continental Resources and EOG Resources  to test the chemical composition of all crude intended for shipment by rail. While the new rules are focused on volatile Bakken crude, they also require more robust tank cars for transporting crudes that are designated as lower risk, such as bitumen from Canada’s oil sands.

“It’s going to have far-reaching ramifications, and I don’t know for how long,” said Marvin Trimble, director of commercial development for Strobel Starostka Transfer Canada Ltd., a Calgary-based rail services company.

Crude-by-rail shipments have soared alongside US oil production as drillers using new technologies to “crack” shale formations faster than pipeline capacity to handle the outflows. The crude bonanza has increased the risk of explosions and fires because much of the new crude oils are more volatile than some traditional domestic oils. During the past year, there have been 10 derailments of trains carrying crude in North America.

Imminent hazard

The directive addresses what the Washington-based agency called an “imminent hazard” to the communities and environment through which crude-hauling trains move. Companies that ignore the order may be fined as much as $175,000 a day for each violation. Individuals may also be subject to fines and up to 10 years in prison, under the emergency order.

“Petroleum crude oil may contain dissolved gases, exhibit corrosive properties, and also may have toxic properties,” the agency said in its order.

The most severe recent incident occurred in July 2013 in Lac- Megantic, Quebec. An unattended train carrying oil rolled away, derailed and exploded in a fireball that killed 47 people and leveled half of the downtown. In December, a BNSF Railway Co. train carrying crude from the Bakken formation crashed in North Dakota, forcing the evacuation of a nearby town.

An investigation by the Federal Railroad Administration found that shippers sometimes misclassified the oil they were offering for sale, loading it into tankers that are not stout enough to safely carry materials in the highest hazard category.

“Misclassification is one of the most dangerous mistakes to be made when dealing with hazardous materials,” the department said in the order. “Misclassification may indicate larger problems with company management, oversight and quality control.”

Industry conference

The agency’s order was issued as railroad companies, refiners and oil producers and distributors gathered at the Crude by Rail 2014 conference organized by American Business Conferences in Glendale, California.

The federal order threatens to reduce or delay shipments of bitumen and other low-volatility fuels by ordering them reclassified, according to oil-by-rail companies. The order raises the risk level of an entire class of less-volatile grades that must now be shipped in safer, “more robust” tank cars.

Oils that were previously categorized as less flammable Group III products must now be labeled as Group I or Group II, which require safer cars.

Car shortage

The directive threatens to exacerbate a shortage of tank cars, forcing US shippers to search for more protective units designed to handle flammable crudes or risk curtailing deliveries, Strobel’s Trimble said at the conference.

“This order affects more than just oil coming out of the Bakken,” Mark Luitwieler, executive vice president of operations for Peaker Energy, said at the industry gathering yesterday. “Shipments of heavier oils such as waxy crude from Utah’s Uinta Basin will be just as affected, even if they’re less flammable,” he predicts.

“That Uinta stuff is just like peanut butter,” said Luitwieler, whose Houston-based company develops crude-by-rail terminals.

The department’s order caused confusion in the industry as refiners and producers tried to understand what the new requirements will mean to their operations and how broadly they will apply to shipments across the country.

Tesoro's Mark Smith said he wasn’t sure what new procedures were being mandated since the company already tests crude shipments.

Testing questions

“We’re taking samples all the time -- we’re taking samples today,” said Smith, vice president of development, supply and logistics for the San Antonio, Texas-based refiner.

“What do you want us to do? What do you want us to test for?” asked George Stutzmann, director of supply, trading and business development for oil refiner Alon USA Energy. “I’m not really sure what this means or what they expect from us.”

Continental, the biggest producer of Bakken crude, lauded the federal government’s effort to improve the safety of crude- by-rail shipments.

“All crude should be properly tested, classed and transported safely,” Eric Eissenstat, the Oklahoma City-based company’s general counsel, said.

A refining industry trade group criticized the directive for leaving “several questions unanswered,” including how often testing should be conducted and how crude shipments might be affected.

The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers said in a statement it hoped the department “will work collaboratively to answer these and other unanswered questions.”

More rules

Last week, railroads agreed with US regulators to slow trains hauling crude around urban areas and install safety equipment in response to recent accidents.

“Railroads have supported the administration’s pursuit of proper classification and labeling of petroleum crude oil in tank cars by shippers prior to transport,” the American Association of Railroads said. “This is essential to ensuring first responders are able to safely and appropriately respond in the event of an accident or incident.”

Federal regulators are separately considering requiring upgrades to the DOT-111 tank car, which the US National Transportation Safety Board has said must be strengthened to reduce spill risks.

Time bomb

Senator Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, said US regulators need to do more to address the risks of moving crude oil by rail by requiring a swift phase-out of the DOT-111s.

“Transporting crude oil by rail in outdated tank cars -- which have been proven to fail frequently upon derailment -- is a ticking time bomb,” Schumer said today in a conference call with reporters.

He also wants the speed restrictions agreed to by the railroad industry as an additional safety measure to apply more broadly.

Retrofitting the cars may increase rail costs by about 9%, or $1/bbl, Mike Lutz, vice president of midstream for Bakken oil producer Hess Corp., said at the conference yesterday.

Congestion on BNSF Railway Co. tracks in North Dakota has already driven oil-by-rail costs up by about $1/bbl over the past month, slowing deliveries already hindered by winter storms, he said.

“It may add some cost, but the testing itself is probably small in the scheme of things,” industry consultant Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates in Houston, said by phone. “Someone’s going to pay for it, and ultimately it’s going to be the consumer.”



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Robert in Houston
02.28.2014

A few rotten apples spoil it for everyone. If "The Industry" does not police itself, then we are begging the Feds to intervene. And they can only be heavy handed.

Of course BNSF is not innocent either. They have to move the cars, and can refuse if it is misclassified.

Peanut butter is a good one, but also an irrelevant distraction. Neither viscosity nor density is any guarantee of flammability. You can have a properly stabilized 40' Condensate that is no more flammable than diesel. And you can have an unstabilized 20' gloppy heavy oil that is as flammable as gasoline.

Rudolph Caparros
02.27.2014

CHLORINE GAS TRANSPORTATION SAFETY
First Responders ask federal administrations to consider adding secondary containment to rail tank cars used to transport chlorine gas, providing lifesaving safety to First Responders and the public they serve. See First Responders Comments at PETITION C KIT.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

GasPro North America

Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


68%

32%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.