Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



BP sees steep fall in US government fuel contracts

03.10.2014  | 

The London-based company was temporarily barred from new federal contracts and other work after the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. While BP has sued to get the suspension lifted, the US has said it wants to continue the ban, which also affects oil and gas leases coveted by the supplier.

Keywords:

By JONATHAN D. SALANT and KATHLEEN MILLER
Bloomberg

BP, once the Pentagon’s top fuel supplier, is now the biggest loser among US government vendors.

A combination of no big contracts awarded and promised military work withdrawn left BP with a net loss of $654 million in federal contracts in the year that ended Sept. 30, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That compared with $2.51 billion in awards in fiscal 2012.

“I have never heard of a contractor falling in anything remotely like the distance from plus $2 billion to minus $600 million,” said Charles Tiefer, a University of Baltimore law professor and former member of the US Commission on Wartime Contracting. “The government has come down on BP because it needs to see that BP does not merely talk the talk of behaving responsibly but actually walks the walk.”

The London-based company was temporarily barred from new federal contracts and other work after the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. While BP has sued to get the suspension lifted, the US has said it wants to continue the ban, which also affects oil and gas leases coveted by the supplier.

The suspension cost BP the ability to win new federal work that might be worth billions of dollars. The Defense Department, by far the government’s biggest buyer of petroleum products, also withdrew obligations, or promised funding, of more than $400 million last year after one of its offices didn’t buy a minimum amount of fuel required under the contracts.

No Extensions

Government agencies that don’t make such minimum purchases usually extend contracts rather than cancel them, said Rob Burton, a partner at the law firm Venable and deputy administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy under President George W. Bush.

“They feel it’s a high risk to terminate and find alternative sources,” Burton said in an interview.

Instead, the Defense Logistics Agency, part of the Pentagon, chose to let the agreements expire.

“Suspended contractors cannot have the duration of their contracts extended without a compelling reason to do so,” Mimi Schirmacher, a spokeswoman for the agency, said in an e-mail.

Three of the defense agency’s contracts, originally valued at a total of $2.15 billion, were awarded between May and September 2012 before BP’s temporary ban in November 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The three contracts weren’t extended “as a result of the suspension, which we are challenging in court,” Geoff Morrell, a BP spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement.

BP Sues

The company in August sued the Environmental Protection Agency in federal court in Houston to try to get the suspension lifted. “We believe that the EPA’s disqualification and suspension decisions should be invalidated because they are arbitrary and capricious,” Morrell said.

The government in January asked the court to continue the ban, saying BP hasn’t yet demonstrated it would act responsibly.

The EPA imposed the suspension after determining that the company hadn’t fully corrected problems that led to the fatal explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig.

“Given this history, it was wholly reasonable” for the agency to “conclude that BP’s latest round of plans and promises is insufficient to demonstrate that BP is a responsible federal contractor,” the Justice Department said in the court filing.

With BP temporarily blacklisted, the government is turning to other companies.

Largest Sellers

In fiscal 2011, BP was the largest seller of fuel to the military, with $1.37 billion in prime, or direct, contracts. A year later, it ranked just below No. 1 Royal Dutch Shell, based in the Hague, Netherlands -- which had $2.86 billion.

Closely held Refinery Associates of Texas, based in New Braunfels, Texas, was the No. 1 supplier last year, with $1.34 billion. It was followed by Miami-based World Fuel Services, with $1.19 billion, and National Fuel, based in Kabul, Afghanistan, with $912.7 million.

The federal data measure contract obligations, or funding that is set aside for later spending. The data is published by the US government and compiled by Bloomberg.

BP, in the meantime, received just $31 million in contracts from federal agencies, while $685 million in planned orders disappeared, most of it from the withdrawn military work.

The company’s reversal of fortune is unusual, said Brian Friel, a Bloomberg Industries analyst.

Its fall in the rankings shows “the extraordinary circumstance of the Gulf oil spill that led to BP’s fall from grace with the US government,” he said.

Natural Gas

Among federal agencies, the US Justice Department had the most contract obligations with BP in fiscal 2013 -- $341,225 for natural gas at the Bureau of Prisons. Brian Fallon, a Justice Department spokesman, didn’t return e-mails seeking comment.

Suspended companies are allowed to continue to sell to the government under existing contracts or when no alternatives exist.

The suspension may cost BP opportunities to expand its foothold in the Gulf of Mexico. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, part of the Interior Department, has scheduled an auction March 19 for more than 40 million acres for oil and gas exploration.

BP is the second-biggest oil producer in the Gulf with 63.6 million bbl in 2013, second only to Shell, according to Interior Department figures. Chevron is No. 3.

“It’s been a core strength for them,” Brian Youngberg, an energy analyst with Edward Jones & Co. in St. Louis, said in a telephone interview. “They’re anxious to get back into the Gulf.”

More Oil

BP produced more than 200,000 bpd of oil in the fourth quarter from its 10 rigs in the Gulf, CEO Robert Dudley said on Feb. 4 during the company’s fourth-quarter earnings conference call. It expects to eventually produce more than 300,000 bpd of oil in the area, he told investors.

In an investor call last year, Dudley called the Gulf drilling “central to the portfolio for decades to come.”

The suspension won’t prevent BP from bidding March 19, only from winning, Jessica Kershaw, an Interior spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.

If the company is the high bidder and the suspension is lifted during an evaluation period after the auction, BP will win the leases. If the suspension remains in place, it won’t.

BP pleaded guilty in January 2013 to 11 counts of felony seaman’s manslaughter, two pollution violations and one count of lying to Congress in connection with the offshore spill, the worst in US history. It agreed to pay $4.25 billion in related criminal and civil penalties and faces additional fines, in addition to thousands of claims by individuals and companies.

Analyst Youngberg said the US may want the ban in place until all the lawsuits are settled.

“EPA may be saying as long as there’s litigation, they won’t lift the suspension,” he said. “Is that an incentive for BP to settle? Possibly.”



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Dennis
03.12.2014

Fooey on BP. Plenty of American companies will be happy to fill the void.

Bhadresh
03.12.2014

BP have demonstrated commitment for recovery and compensation due to oil spill. In USA , it is considered to give fair chance even to convicted, once they come out after prison terms. This behavior will cost inflation in gas prices, closure of plants and employment. B.P have kept the patience and dignity and fulfilled social and economical obligations. I thing it is time to start business with BP and stop vengance.

EagleEye
03.11.2014

This is short sighted.

The military will pay more from the other refiners and, the other refiners will not have the capacity to adequately supply our military.

aamir
03.11.2014

I applaud the US government for this decision. You shoud continue it for a very long time.

This company is a pariah rules and regulations do not mean anything to it, it has its own twisted ways of working, employs despicable employees who indicate that the heavier they are, the more competent they are.

In a meeting with different companies, if you feel that there is a need for some fresh clean air in the room, you can be sure that BP is somewhere in that room

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT

GasPro North America

Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


67%

33%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.