Hydrocarbon Processing Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.



Keystone XL opponents urge high Nebraska court to void pipeline route

06.24.2014  | 

The decision on whether to approve Keystone will fall to President Barack Obama, who may wait until the Nebraska court rules. The judges have yet to schedule arguments.

Keywords:

By ANDREW HARRIS
Bloomberg

Nebraska landowners opposed to the proposed $5.4 billion Keystone XL pipeline urged the state’s highest court to uphold a judge’s ruling invalidating the route mapped by Governor Dave Heineman and TransCanada.

The property owners urged the state Supreme Court to uphold a February ruling effectively blocking the pipeline. Judge Stephanie Stacy in Lincoln declared TransCanada a common carrier like a railroad. As such, a 2012 law giving the governor control over the path violated a part of the state constitution vesting power in the Public Service Commission.

TransCanada “offers pipeline structures for transportation services, like taxis offer rides to passengers for a fee, and truckers offer cartage for dollars per mile,” the landowners said in a June 20 legal brief. “The currently-proposed pipeline is a structure that will transport crude oil for hire.”

TransCanada, based in Calgary, seeks to build a 1,179-mile (1,897-kilometer) conduit capable of carrying 830,000 bpd of oil from Hardisty, Alberta, to Steele City, Nebraska, where it would connect to an existing network.

Supporters say Keystone will create jobs and promote energy independence. Opponents say petroleum derived from Alberta’s oil sands will contribute to global warming.

The decision on whether to approve Keystone will fall to President Barack Obama, who may wait until the Nebraska court rules. The judges have yet to schedule arguments, and a decision may not come until after Congress’s midterm elections.

Energy East

TransCanada has said it will seek Canadian government permission to construct a different, longer, pipeline giving it a conduit to the Atlantic Ocean. That proposed 2,700-mile pipeline, called Energy East, would carry 1.1 million bpd of oil across six provinces to a refinery and export terminal at Saint John, New Brunswick.

Heineman, a Republican who’s leaving office on Dec. 31, and state Attorney General Jon Bruning, who sought to succeed him, argued in April that the three landowners who sued haven’t shown they’ve been injured by the plan and lack standing to sue.

Bruning last month lost the Republican Party’s gubernatorial primary to former Ameritrade Holding Corp. Vice Chairman Pete Ricketts.

David Domina, the landowners’ lawyer and a Democrat seeking a US Senate seat, said his clients have been harmed.

“There is no competitor, different regulator or differently affected landowner to bring this suit,” he said in a phone interview. “The state belongs to the citizens, and they are its saving watchfulness.”



Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.

Related articles

FEATURED EVENT


Sign-up for the Free Daily HP Enewsletter!

Boxscore Database

A searchable database of project activity in the global hydrocarbon processing industry

Poll

Should the US allow exports of crude oil? (At present, US companies can export refined products derived from crude but not the raw crude itself.)


65%

35%




View previous results

Popular Searches

Please read our Term and Conditions and Privacy Policy before using the site. All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws.
© 2014 Hydrocarbon Processing. © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company.