POLL FINDINGS: US ethane advantage appears only temporary

By Ben DuBose
Online Editor

HOUSTON -- The "ethane advantage" held by the US petrochemical industry is very real, but it may not last that long.

Out of hundreds of votes cast by readers in a recent HydrocarbonProcessing.com industry poll, about 80% of professionals predict North American ethane feedstocks will remain cost-advantaged to the US for 10 years or fewer.

Relative to the rest of the world, 49% said the US would hold its cost benefit for up to 10 years, while 31% predicted the US to maintain its advantage for only up to 5 years.

Just 20% forecast the cost savings to last for a longer period than the next decade.

Numerous new cracker projects are slated to come onstream in the second half of this decade, as companies seek to capitalize on the surge of shale-derived feedstocks. As many as 12 companies, including Dow Chemical, have expressed formal interest or plans to build new US ethylene capacity.

But if the latest poll is to believed, timing is a significant issue. That is, companies need to complete construction as soon as possible in order to take advantage of short-term margins.

One obstacle to the US petrochemical industry's advantage could come in the form of increased LNG exports. If more export projects are approved, it means more of the shale gas will be sent to foreign buyers. That could, in turn, raise demand and domestic ethane prices due to increased competition.

Chemical companies such as Dow, however, say the US would be better served to export manufactured goods rather than raw materials. The outcome of this dispute could go a long way in determining the long-term competitiveness of the US petrochemical industry.

To see more details on this poll as well as access prior Hydrocarbon Processing poll results, click here.


(Editor’s note: Polls are where we gather industry sentiment on significant issues of the day. Visit the HP home page to weigh in on our latest poll on crude oil transportation for North American refiners.)

The Author

Comments