July 2000


Are spent hydrocracking catalysts listed hazardous wastes?

The author discusses critical points from the U.S. EPA’s memorandum regarding spent ‘dual purpose’ catalysts

Rapaport, D., Jerome Headlands Press, Inc.

A recent memorandum by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) clarifies that spent catalysts resulting from "dual purpose" hydroprocessing reactors are hazardous waste. The improper classification of such catalysts could become a litigious nightmare for refiners. The author provides insight into the definitions in the EPA regulations that refiners must follow when determining how spent hydroprocessing catalysts should be classified.   Spent catalysts from "dual process" units - third memorandum issued    

Log in to view this article.

Not Yet A Subscriber? Here are Your Options.

1) Start a FREE TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION and gain access to all articles in the current issue of Hydrocarbon Processing magazine.

2) SUBSCRIBE to Hydrocarbon Processing magazine in print or digital format and gain ACCESS to the current issue as well as to 3 articles from the HP archives per month. $409 for an annual subscription*.

3) Start a FULL ACCESS PLAN SUBSCRIPTION and regain ACCESS to this article, the current issue, all past issues in the HP Archive, the HP Process Handbooks, HP Market Data, and more. $1,995 for an annual subscription.  For information about group rates or multi-year terms, contact email Peter Ramsay or call +44 20 3409 2240*.

*Access will be granted the next business day.

Related Articles

From the Archive



{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}