October 2000

Special Report: Plant Safety and Reliability

Improve catalyst removal methods

In this case history, efforts to minimize the hazard caused more problems and increased the risks to the task

Schneider, D. F., Stratus Engineering, Inc.

Preventing dangerous actions is something that is equated with being safe. However, taking proper action is definitely a very important aspect of safety. Overly cautious measures can impose, and possibly raise, risks with many operations done in hydrocarbon processing facilities. In this case study, the "pros and cons" for the catalyst change of a C4-selective hydrotreater were evaluated. Judging that an inert entry to remove residual catalyst was dangerous, plant management elected to use other methods. Unfortunately, the selected, cautious safe approach incorporated other risks to the catalyst change. Remember: ca

Log in to view this article.

Not Yet A Subscriber? Here are Your Options.

1) Start a FREE TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION and gain access to all articles in the current issue of Hydrocarbon Processing magazine.

2) SUBSCRIBE to Hydrocarbon Processing magazine in print or digital format and gain ACCESS to the current issue as well as to 3 articles from the HP archives per month. $409 for an annual subscription*.

3) Start a FULL ACCESS PLAN SUBSCRIPTION and regain ACCESS to this article, the current issue, all past issues in the HP Archive, the HP Process Handbooks, HP Market Data, and more. $1,995 for an annual subscription.  For information about group rates or multi-year terms, contact J'Nette Davis-Nichols at Jnette.Davis-Nichols@GulfEnergyInfo.com or +1 713.520.4426*.

*Access will be granted the next business day.

Related Articles

From the Archive

Comments

Comments

{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}