IMO: Ships will be "unseaworthy" if miss sulfur emission rule

LONDON (Reuters) — Ships which do not meet cuts to the amount of sulfur they can burn in their engines risk being declared "unseaworthy," the International Maritime Organization (IMO) said on Thursday.

Photo courtesy of IMO.
Photo courtesy of IMO.

Shippers and refiner are not sure how they will comply with rules finalized last year which require ships worldwide to cut sulfur emissions from 3.5% to 0.5% by 2020.

The IMO said there would be no delays or exceptions to the coming rules, whether or not the industry takes the steps it needs to comply, and warned that all parties face consequences if they do not play their part.

Edmund Hughes, head of air pollution and energy efficiency with the IMO, said that vessels owners are taking a huge risk if they choose not to comply with the rules.

He warned that a non-compliant ship could be considered as "unseaworthy," thus "affecting their charter party and also indemnity in the event of an insurance claim."

The IMO is holding sessions in February and later in 2018 on "how to ensure consistent implementation."

Already, an IMO panel approved an amendment to rules that will require suppliers to certify that the bunker fuel they are selling is under the sulfur limits, or that the ships have scrubbers installed, another method of compliance or have an official exemption from Jan. 1, 2019.

Few ships have so far opted to install the costly "scrubbers," which would allow them to keep burning high-sulfur fuel oil, meaning sellers will be under pressure to cut the availability of higher sulfur fuel.

Reporting by Libby George; Editing by Mark Potter and Alexander Smith

Check out previous coverage:

ESAI Energy: IMO sulfur content cap will destroy fuel oil demand

Editorial Comment: Is the industry ready for IMO 2020?

Shell mulls German refinery upgrade to meet 2020 IMO sulfur rules

IRPC Americas '17: IMO 2020 panelists advocate bunker sulfur removal "at the source"

Related News

From the Archive



{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}